The Beautiful Truth takes you on a creepy mellow journey with a 15 year old boy as he discovers the cure for cancer.The cure for cancer?? That's right, THE cure for cancer.
Turns out, after decades and billions of dollars in research done by pharmaceutical companies, Max Gerson had already discovered the cure back in the 1920's. Oops. Apparently, lots of organic fresh juice, and SPOILER ALERT: Coffee Enemas is all it takes!
Avoiding alot of modern things also helps:Pharmaceutical drugs, MSG, aspartame, vaccines, food irradiation, genetically modified foods, dental amalgams, water fluoridation, and radioactive kitchen sinks, are SHOCK, all bad for you! It does seem the filmmaker took every controversial potentially carcinogenic but "proven safe" thing he could find; but I can't disagree, staying away from some of those things is probably not going to hurt.
Just remember, asbestos was proven safe too!
Apparently cancer researchers have been conspiring to bury the cure in order to make money; because you can't patent sticking coffee up your arse! If it really cured cancer, then wouldn't the active ingredients in coffee be extracted, properly dosed, added to and tweaked, and then sold at pharmacies as cancer cure douches by said conspirators? You'd make billions! Especially if marketed as a daily thing, or would it just be too kinky for your average Joe to stomach?
The segment about Kirlian Photography showing the aura difference between processed food and organic sent my suspicion levels off the chart. "All living things have a distinctive energy field around them that can be measured and even photographed". The film immediately lumped itself in with these air heads.
The problem is that the film is so dotted with fiction that the facts might get a little lost during its 92 minute droning time. The facts can essentially be boiled down to just one sentence: To lower your risk of cancer, eat healthy food and avoid potential carcinogens. Here's one way of doing both at the same time.
So don't bother with The Beautiful Truth, that is, unless you're looking for a bullshit enema. The far more beautiful truth it seems, is that science and reason have almost doubled life expectancy and far improved quality of life in just the last 100 years. Sure there will be a few side effects, but can anyone argue it hasn't been worth it?
Posts
Eating To Starve Cancer -
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ted.com/talks/william_li.html
I know I'm commenting on something way old. I found this blog because I'm an atheist, keep on keepin on, etc.
ReplyDeleteAnyway I just wanted to point cancer arguably has been cured multiple times and is being repressed by pharmaceutical companies in alliance with the medical system. The medical system relies completely on outdated irradiation techniques that give you more cancer so they don't like anything that doesn't use radiation.
Google "burzynski the movie" for probably the biggest example. And the reason corporations aren't getting rich is that burzynski personally owns the patent and is more concerned about good science than profit, which doesn't sit well with the status quo. This paired with not radiating people makes it unpopular.
Oh and there's a transcript of the movie if you're like me and prefer reading things. After forcing myself to sit through the whole thing I was pissed that I could have been reading it.
Sticking coffee up your ass is still a bad idea though.
The proof is in this video link given by Infidel below. If you don't believe...watch this Ted.com 2010 lecture, by a scientist who might not have seen the documentary.......
ReplyDeleteInfidelMay 30, 2010 6:05 PM
Eating To Starve Cancer -
http://www.ted.com/talks/william_li.html